1,000,000 post thread

[tiremonkey2000]

never seen it before

[tiremonkey2000]

pretty good so far

[tiremonkey2000]

so i will be back during commercials

[tiremonkey2000]

to post some more senclise dribble

[tiremonkey2000]

:rofl2:

[tiremonkey2000]

crazy.....

[tiremonkey2000]

that talking snake was cool

[tiremonkey2000]

now i don't know what to say

[tiremonkey2000]

speechless

[tiremonkey2000]

:rofl2:

[tiremonkey2000]

i watched pirates of the carribean 2 yesterday

[tiremonkey2000]

it was pretty good

[tiremonkey2000]

now there's gonna be a 3rd. one

[tiremonkey2000]

did'nt know that

[tiremonkey2000]

now i'm watching Tremors 2

[tiremonkey2000]

now i'm watching Tremors 2

[tiremonkey2000]

Oooppss double post

[tiremonkey2000]

:rofl2:

[BakedDon]

Looks like I am again going to be published in the newspaper. I wrote an atricle about beef cloning, and how people's arguments against it were unsound. I will post it in another thread.
WHere is this article, Congrats for the publish. So you are for beef cloning and think the arguments against it are unsound. I just read an article about how certain protiens are missing from cloned cows and that we were going to have to rethink that whole thing.

[BakedDon]

They are trying to own the food with patents
http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=Truth+About+Genetically+Modified+




http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5266884912495233634&sourceid=docidfeed&hl=en

http://conspiracyrealitytv.com/EM_GENO_codex_herb.html

[BakedDon]

Control of the food supply

[BakedDon]

taking away from a diversity that took nature millions of years to develop.

[mathmission]

If there are problems with the protiens, then yes, I think that the process should not be done, but if they are exact copies... I don't think that there should be a problem. If you have moral reasons for not eating cloned beef, that's cool too. I have no problem with that. I just have problems with people who make arguments with unsound facts. Saying that it isn't natural is not a good argument, as we humans already eat a ton of shit that isn't natural. Think of all the Ho-Hos Tiremonkey eats! :lol:

[tiremonkey2000]

i hate inventory!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[riscy]

I hate going to the dentist - spent three hours in the chair today

[riscy]

Oh well, nearly finished and then that will last for 20 years!

[mathmission]

Good to see you posting Riscy. I was about to email you to make sure that everything was ok. Can't talk at the moment, but wanted to say hello!

[riscy]

Hi - see you later

[mathmission]

Man, I'm actually quiite busy today!

[riscy]

Keeps you off the streets then, MM

[riscy]

Off very soon, if you are not around

[riscy]

Might just go for a few quick posts however

[riscy]

Might as well try to increase the post count

[riscy]

Less than 20 to go for another marker

[riscy]

Not too far

[riscy]

So a few short posts

[riscy]

Like this

[riscy]

post here

[riscy]

Oh well, so MM is not around - too bad

[riscy]

will have to go solo

[riscy]

10

[riscy]

9

[riscy]

8

[riscy]

7

[riscy]

6

[riscy]

5

[riscy]

4

[mathmission]

Haha, yeah right!

[riscy]

3

[mathmission]

I wasn't going to let you get away with hitting another landmark without me around!

[mathmission]

Just two more to go!

[mathmission]

Aw, did I come in here, and you're gone?!?

[riscy]

Hi MM

[riscy]

Glad to have you here

[mathmission]

Hello?!

[mathmission]

Hey, there you are!

[riscy]

As the bishop ... Aw, did I come in here, and you're gone?!?

[mathmission]

And congrats on the 4500!

[riscy]

Well, almost out of here - 1 am now

[mathmission]

how are you today?

[mathmission]

Oh wow. Well yeah, better get some sleep. You were gone there for a few days, and I was worried that something had come up over the new year...

[mathmission]

But glad to have you back

[riscy]

Ta much - way behind you though - but creeping up.And congrats on the 4500!

[riscy]

I've been posting pretty much every day, I thoughtOh wow. Well yeah, better get some sleep. You were gone there for a few days, and I was worried that something had come up over the new year...

[mathmission]

that's true!

[mathmission]

Hmm, maybe it was just me, and I kept missing when you were in...

[riscy]

Had the mother-in-law here : she left this am

:dotdance:

[mathmission]

Had the mother-in-law here : she left this am

:dotdance:
HAHA!

[riscy]

Well, hope to catch you in the next few days MM - otherwise we will have to email and catch up.

[mathmission]

Indeed. Have a good night my friend!

[mathmission]

I'll try to be around when I can!

[mathmission]

I'll be gone for some time tomorrow, but back shortly after that

[riscy]

Take care - hope you had a good lunch

[riscy]

See you soon, tc

[mathmission]

you too! Cya :hello:

[mathmission]

One more for today!

[mathmission]

11,150

[tiremonkey2000]

We did inventory today, i started at 7 am. and finished at 7 pm. tonight

[tiremonkey2000]

I am so tired

[tiremonkey2000]

I will probably end up in bed soon

[tiremonkey2000]

Because we have to finish the inventory tomorrow

[BakedDon]

If there are problems with the protiens, then yes, I think that the process should not be done, but if they are exact copies... I don't think that there should be a problem. If you have moral reasons for not eating cloned beef, that's cool too. I have no problem with that. I just have problems with people who make arguments with unsound facts. Saying that it isn't natural is not a good argument, as we humans already eat a ton of shit that isn't natural. Think of all the Ho-Hos Tiremonkey eats! :lol:
yea I dont personally have a problem with cloned meat (I doubt that would be kosher but I dont know)

but this will reduce the genetic make up of the cows down to a few rather than the many that nature and breeding good strong ones together. What does it help the consumer to clone rather than breed, is it going to make it cheaper, healthier, or at least taste better. If not I say leave it alone.

[BakedDon]

Most of the world has decided to band these types of foods and watch our kids for the next ten to twenty years. We are guinea pigs in a Brave New World.

[BakedDon]

personally a ho ho would no longer be in my diet. Im almost over thirty so I would much rather eat an apple or pear.

[BakedDon]

With just one click, you can advance California's health care cause.

Right now, just click on this link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GyWiVLdR47c to take you to YouTube.com and our "OneCareNow Video" at the site. Then watch the new 3-minute video. That's it!

By viewing the video, you help us qualify for a highly-prized "most watched" ranking on YouTube.com.

This could mean thousands more public views of this important, life-changing video. Remember, your "hits" on this trailer must happen in the first 48 hours after we posted it today! (If you have an extra minute, you can also give the video a 5 star review and post a comment as well.)

If you have not seen the full 22 minute version of the video, "The Healthcare Solution: California OneCare," you can do that at YouTube or at www.onecarenow.org.

One more big favor? Today, please forward this request to everyone on your email list. We want thousands of hits to turn into millions of new friends for the OneCareNow Campaign for SB 840 and universal health insurance: Full coverage, for all, for life, for less!

Thanks,

Andrew McGuire
Executive Director
Health Care for All - California, and the
OneCareNow.org 365 City Campaign for SB 840

[BakedDon]

Help NOW! Make the "OneCareNow Video" a "Most Watched" video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GyWiVLdR47c

[BakedDon]

Don't undermine your worth by comparing yourself with others.
It is because we are different that each of us is special.
Don't set your goals by what other people deem important.

Only you know what is best for you.
Don't take for granted the things closest to your heart.
Cling to them as you would your life, for without them life is
meaningless.

Don't let your life slip through your fingers by living in the past or
for the future.
By living your life one day at a time, you live all the days of your
life.

Don't give up when you still have something to give.
Nothing is really over until the moment you stop trying.

Don't be afraid to admit that you are less than perfect.
It is this fragile thread that binds us to each other.

Don't be afraid to encounter risks.
It is by taking chances that we learn how to be brave.

Don't shut love out of your life by saying it's impossible to find.
The quickest way to receive love is to give love.

The fastest way to lose love is to hold it too tightly;
and the best way to keep love is to give it wings.

Don't dismiss your dreams.
To be without dreams is to be without hope;
to be without hope is to be without purpose.

Don't run through life so fast that you forget not only where you've
been, but also where you're going.
Life is not a race, but a journey to be savored each step of the way.

Author: Nancye Sims

[BakedDon]

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4488542891415681105&q=september+11+revisited
9-11 archived news footage

[BakedDon]

You Don't Know Dick!

http://www.youtube.com/v/HukHSrWgFkM


http://www.youtube.com/v/Q8cIxtBEVIk

DICK CHENEY - THE UNAUTHORIZED BIOGRAPHY

[BakedDon]

MM can we get a link to your article and I'll digg up the one on the certain protien that is underdeveloped

[BakedDon]

Parents defend decision to keep girl a child

Chris Ayres
London Times
Thursday, January 4, 2007

Her name is Ashley X, and she is the little girl who will never grow up.
Until New Year’s Day, not even her first name was known. Ashley was a faceless case study, cited in a paper by two doctors at Seattle Children’s Hospital as they outlined a treatment so radical that it brought with it allegations of “eugenics”, of creating a 21st-century Frankenstein’s monster, of maiming a child for the sake of convenience.

The reason for the controversy is this: three years ago, when Ashley began to display early signs of puberty, her parents instructed doctors to remove her uterus, appendix and still-forming breasts, then treat her with high doses of oestrogen to stunt her growth.

In other words, Ashley was sterilised and frozen in time, for ever to remain a child. She was only 6.

Ashley, the daughter of two professionals in the Seattle area, never had much hope of a normal life.

Afflicted with a severe brain impairment known as static encephalopathy, she cannot walk, talk, keep her head up in bed or even swallow food. Her parents argued that “keeping her small” was the best way to improve the quality of her life, not to make life more convenient for them.

Because of her small size, the parents say, Ashley will receive more care from people who will be able to carry her: “Ashley will be moved and taken on trips more frequently and will have more exposure to activities and social gatherings ... instead of lying down in her bed staring at TV all day long.”

By remaining a child, they say, Ashley will have a better chance of avoiding everything from bed sores to pneumonia — and the removal of her uterus means that she will never have a menstrual cycle or risk developing uterine cancer.

Because Ashley was expected to have a large chest size, her parents say that removing her breast buds, including the milk glands (while keeping the nipples intact), will save her further discomfort while avoiding fibrocystic growth and breast cancer.

They also feared that large breasts could put Ashley at risk of sexual assault.

The case was approved by the hospital’s ethics committee in 2004, which agreed that because Ashley could never reproduce voluntarily she was not being subjected to forced sterilisation, a form of racial cleansing promoted in the 1920s and known as eugenics (it was satirised in F. Scott Fitzgerald’s novel The Great Gatsby). However, the case of Ashley X was not made public, and, as a result, no legal challenges were ever made.

Ashley’s doctors, Daniel Gunther and Douglas Diekema, wrote in their paper for the October issue of the Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine that the treatment would “remove one of the major obstacles to family care and might extend the time that parents with the ability, resources and inclination to care for their child at home might be able to do so”.

The paper inspired hundreds of postings on the internet: many supportive, others furious. “I find this offensive if not perverse,” read one. “Truly a milestone in our convenience-minded society.”

It was the critical comments that finally provoked Ashley’s father to respond.

While remaining anonymous, he posted a remarkable 9,000-word blog entry at 11pm on New Year’s Day, justifying his decision.


The posting includes links to photographs of Ashley, in which the faces of other family members, including Ashley’s younger sister and brother, have been blanked out. “Some question how God might view this treatment,” he wrote. “The God we know wants Ashley to have a good quality of life and wants her parents to be diligent about using every resource at their disposal . . . to maximise her quality of life.”
Ashley’s father went on to describe how her height is now expected to remain at about 4ft 5in (1.3m), and her weight at 75lb (34kg). Without the treatment, she would have grown into a woman of average height and weight, probably about 5ft 6in and 125lb, with a normal lifespan.
The medical profession is divided. “I think most people, when they hear of this, would say this is just plain wrong,” wrote Jeffrey Brosco. of the University of Miami, in an editorial. “But it is a complicated story . . . (But) high-dose oestrogen therapy to prevent out-of-home placement simply creates a new Sophie’s Choice for parents to confront.

“If we as a society want to revise the nature of the harrowing predicament that these parents face, then more funds for home-based services, not more medication, is what is called for.”

George Dvorsky, a director of the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies, countered: “If the concern has something to do with the girl’s dignity being violated, then I have to protest by arguing that the girl lacks the cognitive capacity to experience any sense of indignity.”

[BakedDon]

Democrats Set To Renew Attack On Free Speech
First session of Congress sees re-introduction of federal hate crime, anti-bullying acts

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Tuesday, January 2, 2007

A new piece of legislation set to be re-introduced in Congress by the Democrats under the guise of anti-bullying would reprimand schoolchildren for verbal criticism of their peers in any context, including sexual orientation, religion or simply expression of an opposing idea. The bill echoes federal hate crime legislation about to be debated as Congress enters its first session tomorrow.

The Antibullying Campaign Act of 2005 was rendered obsolete after the recent expiration of Congress but Fox News radio reports that its most ardent champion, Representative Jerrold Nadler of New York, is set to initiate its reintroduction.

The bill outlines a $300 million dollar federal program to target bullies who harass other kids about their sexual orientation, gender identity or religion.

However, the language of the legislation is so loosely defined that it could punish kids for simply verbally disagreeing with another student about so-called "alternative lifestyles."

The bill defines harassment as, "conduct, including verbal conduct, that creates, or would create, a hostile environment by substantially interfering with a student's educational benefits, opportunities, or performance, or with a student's physical or psychological well-being."

Harassment would be taken to include, "any distinguishing characteristic of an individual, including actual or perceived race, color, national origin, ethnicity, religion, disability, sexual orientation, sex, gender identity or expression, family composition or circumstance, or economic circumstance."



Targeting young children for the words they say and the behavior they exhibit is a reflection of a control freak society gone overboard. In a recent article we highlighted several cases where kindergarten kids as young as five were having sexual harassment "offences" placed on file for pinching another child's bottom.

How toddlers and extremely young children can engage in "sexual harassment" when they don't even know what sex is nor have any sexual feelings matters not to County officials across the country who are following these nightmare socialist style policies by the book.

All of these measures are aimed at getting kids in the system from a very early age and training them that obedient docility is the only conduct that will be tolerated. Perfect automatons for the state who will grow up to accept the mandate that all free speech is offensive to somebody and should therefore be highly regulated.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get 5 months free at Prison Planet.tv when you sign up for our New Years Special! TV shows, conference footage, field reports, protest clips, in studio camera and audio interviews, books, every Alex Jones film, dozens of other documentaries! Click here to subscribe!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The anti-bullying legislation dovetails a similarly reinvigorated federal hate crimes law that according to commentators could lead "directly to an end of free speech."

"The Local Law Enforcement Enhancement Act" criminalizes any public criticism of homosexuality, transvestites, witches pedophiles, satanists and others who lead self-professed alternative lifestyles, defining any disagreement and debate with these groups as "hate crime." The bill also classifies "sexist words" used by men during intercourse as "rape," and greases the skids for the criminalizing criticism of the Jewish political lobby in Washington - along with a whole raft of other twilight zone regulations.

Decrees of political correctness and the doctrines of liberal mind control have swamped Europe to the point where Christian ministers are being arrested for reading Bible passages. It is also an illegal offence in Britain to criticize homosexuality.



- In November 2002 BBC presenter Robin Page was arrested for saying in a speech a month earlier that the farming community should have the same rights as Muslims, homosexuals and vegetarians. Police traveled from 200 miles away to question Page, before detaining him in a prison cell with dried feces on the wall and later charging him with incitement to racial hatred - simply for stating farmers should have the same rights!

- In 2001, Gloucestershire Police set up 'Operation Napkin' in which senior police officers were sent to 'ethnic restaurants' to eat four-course dinners and at the same time listen out for "racist hate speech." Arrests were made as a result of the program.

- In January a student who called a mounted policeman's horse "gay" was arrested under section 5 of the Public Order Act for making homophobic remarks and taken to court.

- Just last month a 14-year-old school girl was arrested in Manchester for making a "racist comment," after she refused to work with a group of Asians during a science tutorial because none of them spoke English.

- Reports of "hate crime raids" where PC subversives are rounded up like terrorists by police are commonplace.

- In the U.S., members of the Repent America organization were arrested and criminally charged, with prosecutors attempting to secure 47-year prison sentences, for the crime of reading Bible passages on the street during Philadelphia's 2004 "Outfest" gay pride march.

[mathmission]

Hey BakeDon

[BakedDon]

Where will you be for the revolution???

[mathmission]

I PMed the link to you but here it is again just in case MM Article (http://www.unitethecows.com/forums/showthread.php?t=15578)

[BakedDon]

No respect for those who will be cowering under thier bed.

[BakedDon]

I PMed the link to you but here it is again just in case MM Article (http://www.unitethecows.com/forums/showthread.php?t=15578)
thanks

[mathmission]

That's an interesting story about the girl that was treated to remain a girl

[BakedDon]

I'll be back wit the cow article

[mathmission]

thanks
No problem!

[mathmission]

Hope things are going well for you this morning Riscy

[mathmission]

Just got to work, starting my research on opening my own theater.

[BakedDon]

That's an interesting story about the girl that was treated to remain a girl
found it on prison planet. I wonder what she would of decided if she was asked. THen at six she may of chose that, but I doubt it, I think everyone wants to grow up.

[mathmission]

found it on prison planet. I wonder what she would of decided if she was asked. THen at six she may of chose that, but I doubt it, I think everyone wants to grow up.
True, but then again, to forever be a child does have it's pros. But I believe you're right. I think that deep down, we all want to grow up because of the way we are treated when we are children.

I understand the parent's argument that it will increase her quality of life, and removing those certain parts does somewhat have justification. But I'm not sure how I feel about them just doing it. When it comes to things like this, I don't really respond either way.

[BakedDon]

Just got to work, starting my research on opening my own theater.
Wow let me know how that goes. There are hardly no independent theaters around here. Only one in Michigan (Farmington Hills ) plays films like What the Bleep and Scanner Darkly. I hope if you get one going you will play more than the top ten blockbusters.

[mathmission]

We are actually not going to show any recent blockbusters actually. We are going to show classic films. I think our first week we're opening with the 1956 12 Angry Men

[BakedDon]

True, but then again, to forever be a child does have it's pros. But I believe you're right. I think that deep down, we all want to grow up because of the way we are treated when we are children.

I understand the parent's argument that it will increase her quality of life, and removing those certain parts does somewhat have justification. But I'm not sure how I feel about them just doing it. When it comes to things like this, I don't really respond either way.
it is tough...

if it were your kid though

I doubt you would go through the extreme operations to achieve an unnatural but longer live. or at least I know I wouldnt.

[mathmission]

If we get large in the next few years, we'll expand and start showing newer independent films

[BakedDon]

We are actually not going to show any recent blockbusters actually. We are going to show classic films. I think our first week we're opening with the 1956 12 Angry Men
Wow that would be sweet.

what kind of budget and investors would that take.


I just watched THX 1138

Pre Star Wars

Great Movie

sort of 1984ish

[mathmission]

I doubt you would go through the extreme operations to achieve an unnatural but longer live. or at least I know I wouldnt.
You're probably right. But I don't think that I would not because of it being unnatural. I think I would not do it because I wouldn't feel as if it would have a significant change on the quality of life.

[BakedDon]

Off to work L8ter MM

[mathmission]

Wow that would be sweet.

what kind of budget and investors would that take.


Well, it would take quite a bit of startup cash to get things going. To get the rights to the films, it will cost between $250 and $350 bucks per film for a four day showing. The majority of our money will come in on food, beer, wine, and liquor.

Be back soon BakeDon. I have to go to a quick meeting.

[BakedDon]

I guess I use unnatural to sum up a feeling of frankenstien although I am not against medical advances or anything. If a kid has cancer I wouldnt let it run its natural course. That is a tough one.

[BakedDon]

liquor

sounds like a fun theater

the state theater serves and it is a ggood time

[mathmission]

Oh yea! I agree.... liquor, and beer in a theater is what makes it a theater

[tiremonkey2000]

Oh yea! I agree.... liquor, and beer in a theater is what makes it a theater

We have a place in clearwater that does that. It shows new movies and serves dinner and drinks.

[tiremonkey2000]

Well i'm off to work this morning for 4 hrs. to finish inventory be back this afternoon.

[BakedDon]

Now if ya really wanna make a theater experiance it would be mushrooms and pot. I guess thats what the Detroit Drive In is for...

[BakedDon]

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1167467657033&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

Most Jews ever set to enter Congress

By HILARY LEILA KRIEGER



A record number of Jewish members will enter Congress Thursday, but more remarkable are the unparalleled positions of power they will hold on committees related to Israel, many local Jewish activists say.

Six new Jewish legislators will be joining 37 familiar faces as the 110th Congress convenes, making the total the highest-ever, according to Doug Bloomfield, a former legislative director for AIPAC.

"It's unprecedented that there have been so many [Jews] in so many positions of leadership in both houses," Bloomfield said, using a Jewish simile for how that fact will affect support for Israel: Like chicken soup, it won't hurt.

Other political analysts went further, saying that congressional backing of Israel would remain at least as strong it has been, if not stronger.

Among the familiar House faces on key committees will be Tom Lantos (D-Calif.) as chairman of the International Relations Committee (HIRC) and Gary Ackerman (D-NY) is set to be chair of the HIRC Middle East subcommittee. Nita Lowey (D-NY) should be chairing the appropriations subcommittee on foreign operations. Ackerman's and Lowey's appointments are expected to be officially announced within the next few days.

In the Senate, Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) will head the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, while Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) is expected to take over the Foreign Affairs Middle East Subcommittee if unsuccessful presidential candidate John Kerry (D-Mass.) doesn't challenge her for the job.

Also, much of the Democratic leadership is considered strong on Israel, including incoming Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nevada) and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Maryland) and Rahm Emanuel (D-Illinois), head of the House Democratic Caucus.

And many Republican backers of Israel, who no longer head committees, still continue to serve in minority leadership roles.

Plus, Jews - who voted overwhelmingly Democrat in the November election (87 percent, according to exit polls) - often see more eye-to-eye with Democratic members on domestic issues and have strong personal relationships with them, according to Ira Forman, executive director of the National Jewish Democratic Council.

Pelosi has outlined a list of legislative priorities for the first 100 hours of the congressional session, including raising the minimum wage; funding stem cell research; implementing the 9/11 Commission's recommendations; and energy reform.
The Orthodox Union's public policy director Nathan Diament, often more at home with Republicans on church-state issues but supportive of some of the Democrats' initial legislative efforts, such as stem cell research, also expressed satisfaction with the incoming leadership.

"It's certainly as strong as it's ever been [on Israel]," he said.

Forman said the incoming Democratic, pro-Israel leadership constellation was an opportunity for the party to rebut Republican charges during the elections that the Democrats were soft on Israel.

Matt Brooks, executive director of the Republican Jewish Coalition, however, maintained that Republicans still had the stronger record on Israel and that it remained to be seen how Democrats handle their new position.

Brooks also criticized one of the pieces of legislation expected to clear the House this week - a government reform bill aimed at preventing lobbyists from taking congressmen on trips abroad.

As a result, his and other Jewish organizations will have to leave their lobbyists at home on trips to Israel. Some groups will set up educational divisions as a way of enabling the visits. Brooks said it would hurt the value of these trips if some of the most informed members of organizations would be unable to come.

He did acknowledge that, "Certainly having somebody like Tom Lantos, who is a passionate defender of Israel, is very good for the Jewish community."

But Brooks added that he was concerned by several Democrats who were not so friendly toward Israel taking on leadership positions, such as new House Appropriations Committee chairman David Obey (D-Wisconsin) and judiciary chairman John Conyers (D-Michigan).

Other observers, though, point to members seen as key critics of Israel who were pushed out of top roles, such as Senators Richard Lugar (R-Indiana) and Lincoln Chafee (R-Rhode Island), Chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee and its Middle East Subcommittee respectively.

In addition, Forman maintained, some Republican leadership tepid on Israel was replaced by stronger supporters. "Hoyer's considered very pro-Israel. Pelosi's pro-Israel and has been very active on the issue. [Outgoing House Speaker Dennis] Hastert (R-Illinois) never was." Bloomfield added that the diminished influence of Evangelicals, many of whom vocally supported Israel, shouldn't worry Israel advocates.

He called Evangelicals "great cheerleaders" whose backing of Israel never resulted in specific action or was really tested. "They might love Israel, but they hate gays more than they love Israel."

But some have raised question marks about how a Democratic Congress would handle issues in the Middle East more broadly.

"There's obviously more interest in speaking to Iran," said one Jewish Democratic strategist who asked not to be named. "[But] I don't see a Democratic Congress being naive about Iran's nuclear intentions." He added, "I don't see this Congress interested in anything which would pressure Israel."

Another Jewish organizational official, also speaking anonymously, said, "There's a more significant group within the Democratic Party than within the Republicans that's more likely to have an affinity with the Palestinians and the peace process, [but] I don't think it's something that will have much impact in the short term."

And ultimately, many Jewish leaders pointed out, that it was the White House that called the shots on foreign policy.

Republican former House majority leader Tom Delay "could be more pro-Israel than the Israeli embassy," said the Jewish official, continuing that when it came to Oslo, Delay "really did not stop Clinton at all."

American Jewish Committee legislative director Richard Foltin echoed many when he said that Israel, in any case, is a bipartisan issue.

"You see a Congress that is supportive of Israel, so I don't think you're going to see much of a difference. You're going to see bipartisan continuation of support for Israel," he said.

[BakedDon]

Is it paranoia when they are watching you ???

[BakedDon]

Oh My God not Robertson's
You gotta watch this

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2007/050107doomsday.htm

Its a You Tube Video but I cant find it without

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2007/050107doomsday.htm

Pat Robertson's Doomsday Conversation With God

[BakedDon]

Pat's busy once again doing the bidding of his new world order masters, recycling fearmongering propaganda that you're all going to die when in actual fact peanuts kill more Americans than terrorists.

If Pat's so pally with the Lord then why didn't he mention a city so everyone could avoid this catastrophe? That's not the purpose, Robertson is pandering to his withering apocalyptic evangelical base while turning droves of young people away from real Christianity and the message that Jesus represents.

"If that's God, I want nothing to do with it."

Thanks Pat, you ****ing moron.

[BakedDon]

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2007/050107doomsday.htm

It's a five min. video in which Pat tells us of his yearly coversation with GOD.

This year GOD told Pat that terrorist are going to attack us in September or

at least by thee end of the year. Possibly with a nuke.

[BakedDon]

Michigan is feeling the squeeze of this economic New World Order

[BakedDon]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tC2uPER9bvQ

[tiremonkey2000]

Now if ya really wanna make a theater experiance it would be mushrooms and pot. I guess thats what the Detroit Drive In is for...
We used to have a drive in until they closed it. We would get a bunch of freinds in a full size van and smoke out. We went to see Twister during a severe thunder and lightning storm, we had the back doors of the van open with a tarp tied across the top, now that was great.

[BakedDon]

Very nice

[tiremonkey2000]

WinAmp is playing Talking Heads - Road to Nowhere

[tiremonkey2000]

Now Marilyn Manson - Tainted Love

[tiremonkey2000]

Flyleaf - I'm so Sick

[tiremonkey2000]

Genisis - Land of Confusion

[tiremonkey2000]

Godsmack - Awake

[tiremonkey2000]

Grateful Dead - Truckin

[tiremonkey2000]

AC/DC - Let there be Rock (Live)

[tiremonkey2000]

SR-71 - Let it Whip

[tiremonkey2000]

Genisis - In the air Tonight

[tiremonkey2000]

Triumph - Fight the good Fight

[tiremonkey2000]

Jane's Addiction - Jane Says (Live)

[tiremonkey2000]

The Firm - Radioactive

[tiremonkey2000]

U2 - With or without You

[tiremonkey2000]

Smash Mouth - All star

[tiremonkey2000]

Foo Fighters - I'll stick Around

[tiremonkey2000]

AC/DC - Night Prowler

[tiremonkey2000]

Korn - Freak on a Leash

[tiremonkey2000]

The Cure - Tainted Love

[tiremonkey2000]

The Bravery - An honest Mistake

[tiremonkey2000]

Incubus - Pardon Me

[tiremonkey2000]

3 Doors Down - Kryptonite

[tiremonkey2000]

Matchbook Romance - Monsters

[tiremonkey2000]

Twisted Sister - We're not gonna take it

[tiremonkey2000]

Audioslave - Show me how to Live

[tiremonkey2000]

Van Halen - Everybody wants Some

[BakedDon]

Future of Iraq: The spoils of war
How the West will make a killing on Iraqi oil riches

London Independent | January 7, 2007
Danny Fortson, Andrew Murray-Watson and Tim Webb
Iraq's massive oil reserves, the third-largest in the world, are about to be thrown open for large-scale exploitation by Western oil companies under a controversial law which is expected to come before the Iraqi parliament within days.

The US government has been involved in drawing up the law, a draft of which has been seen by The Independent on Sunday. It would give big oil companies such as BP, Shell and Exxon 30-year contracts to extract Iraqi crude and allow the first large-scale operation of foreign oil interests in the country since the industry was nationalised in 1972.

The huge potential prizes for Western firms will give ammunition to critics who say the Iraq war was fought for oil. They point to statements such as one from Vice-President Dick Cheney, who said in 1999, while he was still chief executive of the oil services company Halliburton, that the world would need an additional 50 million barrels of oil a day by 2010. "So where is the oil going to come from?... The Middle East, with two-thirds of the world's oil and the lowest cost, is still where the prize ultimately lies," he said.

Oil industry executives and analysts say the law, which would permit Western companies to pocket up to three-quarters of profits in the early years, is the only way to get Iraq's oil industry back on its feet after years of sanctions, war and loss of expertise. But it will operate through "production-sharing agreements" (or PSAs) which are highly unusual in the Middle East, where the oil industry in Saudi Arabia and Iran, the world's two largest producers, is state controlled.

Opponents say Iraq, where oil accounts for 95 per cent of the economy, is being forced to surrender an unacceptable degree of sovereignty.

Proposing the parliamentary motion for war in 2003, Tony Blair denied the "false claim" that "we want to seize" Iraq's oil revenues. He said the money should be put into a trust fund, run by the UN, for the Iraqis, but the idea came to nothing. The same year Colin Powell, then Secretary of State, said: "It cost a great deal of money to prosecute this war. But the oil of the Iraqi people belongs to the Iraqi people; it is their wealth, it will be used for their benefit. So we did not do it for oil."

Supporters say the provision allowing oil companies to take up to 75 per cent of the profits will last until they have recouped initial drilling costs. After that, they would collect about 20 per cent of all profits, according to industry sources in Iraq. But that is twice the industry average for such deals.

Greg Muttitt, a researcher for Platform, a human rights and environmental group which monitors the oil industry, said Iraq was being asked to pay an enormous price over the next 30 years for its present instability. "They would lose out massively," he said, "because they don't have the capacity at the moment to strike a good deal."

Iraq's Deputy Prime Minister, Barham Salih, who chairs the country's oil committee, is expected to unveil the legislation as early as today. "It is a redrawing of the whole Iraqi oil industry [to] a modern standard," said Khaled Salih, spokesman for the Kurdish Regional Government, a party to the negotiations. The Iraqi government hopes to have the law on the books by March.

Several major oil companies are said to have sent teams into the country in recent months to lobby for deals ahead of the law, though the big names are considered unlikely to invest until the violence in Iraq abates.

James Paul, executive director at the Global Policy Forum, the international government watchdog, said: "It is not an exaggeration to say that the overwhelming majority of the population would be opposed to this. To do it anyway, with minimal discussion within the [Iraqi] parliament is really just pouring more oil on the fire."

Vince Cable, the Liberal Democrat Treasury spokesman and a former chief economist at Shell, said it was crucial that any deal would guarantee funds for rebuilding Iraq. "It is absolutely vital that the revenue from the oil industry goes into Iraqi development and is seen to do so," he said. "Although it does make sense to collaborate with foreign investors, it is very important the terms are seen to be fair."

[BakedDon]

Critics Say 'Surge' Is More of The Same

Michael Abramowitz, Robin Wright and Ann Scott Tyson
Washington Post
Sunday, January 7, 2007

President Bush is putting the final touches on his new Iraq policy amid growing skepticism inside and outside the administration that the emerging package of extra troops, economic assistance and political benchmarks for the Baghdad government will make any more than a marginal difference in stabilizing the country.

Washington's debate over Iraq will intensify this week as Bush lays out his plans, probably on Wednesday or Thursday, and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and other administration officials face tough questions from Democrats in congressional hearings.

Although officials said the president has yet to settle on an exact figure of new troops, senior military leaders and commanders are deeply worried that a "surge" of as many as five brigades, or 20,000 troops, in Iraq and Kuwait would tax U.S. ground forces already stretched to the breaking point -- and may still prove inadequate to quell sectarian violence and the Sunni insurgency. Some senior U.S. officials think it could even backfire.

"There is a lot of concern that this won't work," said one military official not authorized to speak publicly about the debate at the Pentagon.

Meanwhile, the political and economic ideas under consideration all appear to be variations on initiatives that U.S. and Iraqi authorities have proved unable to implement successfully since the 2003 invasion or have tried and found wanting, according to former U.S. officials and experts on reconstructing war-torn countries.

Many officials at the State and Defense departments also doubt that the government of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki is capable of making the necessary reforms, given its track record of promising but not delivering since taking power in May and despite Maliki's assurances in a speech yesterday that he would hold Iraqis accountable for implementing a new Baghdad security plan.

A sense that the White House is preparing more of the same is generating deep skepticism among Democrats in Congress, many of whom have signaled strongly in recent days that they would resist sending additional troops to Iraq. And although Republicans say they are open to what Bush proposes this week, they are also asking much more pointed questions about the premises of the White House Iraq policy.

Administration officials are pushing lawmakers and the public to withhold judgment until they see all the elements of the new Iraq policy. Bush consulted with advisers yesterday, and White House speechwriters were working on this week's address. There are signs that there could be some surprises as the administration's debate moves from the staff level to the final deliberations of the president and his closest advisers.

Responding to skepticism about Maliki within some parts of the administration, the White House may make a deeper involvement in Iraq contingent on Maliki cracking down on militias and death squads while also undertaking bold political initiatives and developing a wider economic plan, U.S. officials say. The addition of new U.S. troops, for example, may be phased over several months and conditioned on Iraq following through on promised political reforms, the officials said.

One senior White House official said yesterday that the president considers the skepticism of lawmakers and the public "warranted" and that Bush will not "commit resources to a strategy that is not working." But the official said Bush was heartened by recent promises and plans from Maliki, citing the prime minister's speech in Baghdad yesterday in which he pledged a crackdown on sectarian militias, with U.S. assistance.

The official said U.S. and Iraqi leaders have been refining a new Iraqi security plan, first discussed when Bush and Maliki met in Jordan in November, in which Iraqi forces would take the lead with Americans in support. "It is not just rhetoric," the official said of Maliki. "He is actually putting forward specific plans and making different commitments than he has in the past." Speaking on the condition of anonymity because the president has not settled on a final plan, the official said Bush expects "a different result" from that of previous security plans.

Others have doubts. "I don't know that the Iraqi government has ever demonstrated ability to lead the country, and we shouldn't be surprised," said retired Army Lt. Gen. Jay M. Garner, who was the first U.S. official in charge of postwar Baghdad. "You'll never find, in my lifetime, one man that all the Iraqis will coalesce around." Iraqis are too divided among sectarian, ethnic and tribal loyalties, he said, and their loyalties are regional, not national.

Leon E. Panetta, a member of the Iraq Study Group, which recently delivered a wide-ranging set of recommendations about the way forward in Iraq, said in an interview that the test for him of the seriousness of the president's proposal will be whether Bush, in fact, conditions continued U.S. involvement on tangible progress from the Iraqi government.

"There has got to be some prospect that we are not just going to continue an open-ended commitment," said Panetta, who served in the Clinton White House as chief of staff.

As of yesterday, the president had not settled on a precise plan for adding to the 132,000 U.S. troops already in Iraq, officials said. Senior military and administration officials privately admit their deep concerns that the troop increase will backfire -- and leave the United States with no options left in six to eight months.

[BakedDon]

They note that since the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in March 2003, the U.S. military has repeatedly carried out temporary troop increases of more than 20,000, but violence has continued to rise. The main difference under the new plan is that additional troops would be concentrated in the Baghdad vicinity, where there are currently seven U.S. brigades, and the increase could last longer, from six to 12 months, Pentagon officials said.

Meanwhile, the Joint Chiefs of Staff are worried about overstretching the Army and Marines.

The active-duty Army and Marine Corps lack a significant pool of ready and available forces to send to Iraq. The Army has one fully ready brigade of 3,500 to 4,000 troops on alert to deploy at any time. That on-alert brigade, most recently from the 82nd Airborne Division, has left for Kuwait in what could be the first phase of a troop increase, requiring that another unit take its place.

As a result, increasing ground troops would depend largely on extending units' time in Iraq and accelerating those preparing to go -- meaning longer war-zone tours and shorter periods back home for thousands of soldiers and Marines.

Under the plan, for instance, Army brigades would leave for Iraq sooner than planned, meaning soldiers would have less than 12 months at home to train and rebuild between tours -- a "red line" that outgoing Army Chief of Staff Gen. Peter J. Schoomaker said he did not want to cross, according to a senior military official.

During its two-month interagency review, the Bush administration has struggled the most to come up with proposals to jump-start the stalled political process in Iraq, according to U.S. officials and Western diplomats. The fate of the revised strategy will be determined as much by new movement on Iraq's combustible political front as by success on the battlefield, administration officials said.

But the emerging package looks slim and, absent last-minute additions, appears to be more of the same, according to sources who have been briefed.

The centerpiece of the political plan is the creation of a national reconciliation government that would bring together the two main Shiite parties with the two largest Kurdish parties and the Sunni Iraqi Islamic Party, according to Iraqi and U.S. officials. The goal is to marginalize Moqtada al-Sadr, the leader of the largest and most powerful Shiite militia and head of a group that has 30 seats in parliament and five cabinet posts.

To ensure participation of Sunni moderates, the Bush administration is pressing the Maliki government to take three other major steps: Amend the constitution to address Sunni concerns, pass a law on the distribution of Iraq's oil revenue and change the ruling that forbids the participation of former Baath Party officials.

The three major economic options on the table would revive dormant state-owned industries, launch a micro-finance program to give small loans to generate new businesses and expand a U.S. Agency for International Development stabilization program.

A fourth option would add major funds to a short-term work program to hire Iraqis to clean up trash or do repairs after U.S. and Iraqi troops secure neighborhoods. This Pentagon-run program is a way to lure unemployed men who had joined militias back into the mainstream economy, at least briefly, with the U.S. intention that Iraq would eventually spend its own money to create permanent jobs.

The idea to revive state-owned industries has come full circle. Iraq's economy under Saddam Hussein was state-controlled. When the first U.S. team arrived, its members looked to reenergize the industries as a key element in jump-starting the economy. But the subsequent Coalition Provisional Authority, run by L. Paul Bremer, opted to scrap the effort and emphasize a free-market economy, even though Iraq was ill equipped to make a dramatic conversion. The failure of a free market and the lack of both local and foreign investment has led the Defense Department to launch a massive reassessment.

Apparently absent from the final Iraq plan is any effort to engage Syria and Iran in trying to stabilize the country, a key recommendation from the Iraq Study Group, though the president will probably talk about new efforts to try to jump-start the Arab-Israeli peace process. Rice is expected to visit the Middle East to launch the effort later this month.

[BakedDon]

http://www.ssupload.com/videos/accepted

Accepted

[BakedDon]

http://www.ssupload.com/videos/blood-diamond

Blood Diamond

[BakedDon]

http://www.ssupload.com/videos/borat


Borat

[tiremonkey2000]

Today we are listening too Van Halen - Mean Street

[tiremonkey2000]

Hey BD how are you today

[BakedDon]

http://www.ssupload.com/videos/jackass2

Jack Ass 2 for all You Jack Assses

[BakedDon]

Sup Tire Monkey

[BakedDon]

http://www.ssupload.com/videos/night-at-the-museum

Night At The Museum

[BakedDon]

Good How bout U??

[tiremonkey2000]

Collective Soul - Next Homecoming

[tiremonkey2000]

I'm doing good today thanks, just playing some tunes and watching The Stand on Sci-Fi today.

[BakedDon]

Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest

http://www.ssupload.com/videos/pirates

[BakedDon]

Any particular new movies ya wanna watch ??????

[BakedDon]

http://www.ssupload.com/videos/superman

SuperMan

[BakedDon]

http://www.ssupload.com/videos/apocalypto

Apocalypto

[tiremonkey2000]

Three Dog Night - The Lion Sleeps Tonight

Now this is a classic

[BakedDon]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s097bIS-rKg

New Video for "The Cause of Death"
Immortal Technique

[tiremonkey2000]

Are those the full movie's...

[BakedDon]

http://www.ssupload.com/videos/holiday

The Holiday

[BakedDon]

Yea I watched Blood Diamond and Accepted already

[BakedDon]

They will only be up for a week or so

before discovered

[BakedDon]

so keep it hussssshhhh shhhhhhhedddd

[BakedDon]

http://www.ssupload.com/videos/haroldandkumar-

Harold And Kumar

[BakedDon]

http://www.ssupload.com/videos/cars


Cars

[BakedDon]

http://www.ssupload.com/videos/devil

The Devil Wears Prada!

[tiremonkey2000]

The Strokes - Someday

[tiremonkey2000]

Cool thanks and mums the word....

[BakedDon]

All distractions from whats really going on...

Alex Jones radio show (mms://stream2.emmisaustin.com/klbj-am) mms://stream2.emmisaustin.com/klbj-am

[BakedDon]

Cool thanks and mums the word....
he he yea

[BakedDon]

Alex Jones radio show (mms://stream2.emmisaustin.com/klbj-am)

[tiremonkey2000]

Van Halen - Aint talkin bout Love

[tiremonkey2000]

The Cure - Friday i'm in Love

[BakedDon]

http://www.nfowars.net:443/stream1.pls



Alex Jones Radio Show (http://www.nfowars.net:443/stream1.pls)

[BakedDon]

Alex Jones Radio Show (http://www.nfowars.net:443/stream1.pls)

[BakedDon]

This link is better

Alex Jones Radio Show (http://www.nfowars.net:443/stream1.pls)

open it with iTunes

[tiremonkey2000]

King Missle - Detachable Penis

[BakedDon]

The first link is to thee AM station that carries his show

[BakedDon]

This one is his show latest feed over and over

http://www.nfowars.net:443/stream1.pls
open it with iTunes

[tiremonkey2000]

Don't have itunes i just use Winamp and MusicMatch Jukebox

[BakedDon]

or listen to Coast to Coast on your AM radio

Its thee most listened to show

[BakedDon]

Don't have itunes i just use Winamp and MusicMatch Jukebox
It opens with my power dvd player too

[BakedDon]

I'm not sure about Winamp and MusicMatch Jukebox

but iTunes does suck although it is free

[tiremonkey2000]

Atreyu - Lip Gloss and Black

[BakedDon]

Windows Media Player may work tooo

[BakedDon]

No but Real Player opens it too

[BakedDon]

yea it opens with the Real Player also
Alex Jones Radio Show (http://www.nfowars.net:443/stream1.pls)

[tiremonkey2000]

Rush - Fly by Night

[BakedDon]

http://www.real.com/

[tiremonkey2000]

Motley Crew - Primal Scream

[BakedDon]

www.apple.com/itunes/download/

[tiremonkey2000]

AC/DC -Shot down in Flames

[BakedDon]

http://www.nfowars.net:443/stream1.pls

[tiremonkey2000]

Beastie Boys - Girls

[tiremonkey2000]

The B-52's - Love Shack

[tiremonkey2000]

Blur - Song 2

[tiremonkey2000]

Billy Squier - Lonely is the Night

[tiremonkey2000]

The Sugarhill Gang - Rappers Delight (Long Version) 14min.36 sec.

[tiremonkey2000]

Peter Frampton - Do you feel like we do (Live)

[tiremonkey2000]

Peter Gabriel - Shock the Monkey

[tiremonkey2000]

Cream - Sunshine of your Love

[tiremonkey2000]

Blues Traveler - Run Around

[tiremonkey2000]

Fleetwood Mac - Landslide (live)

[tiremonkey2000]

David Bowie - Golden Years

[tiremonkey2000]

Rush - Working Man

[tiremonkey2000]

I'm jammin real good today and posting like crazy too.

[tiremonkey2000]

Buckcherry - Crazy Bitch

[tiremonkey2000]

Bullet Boys - Smooth up in Ya

[tiremonkey2000]

Beck - E-Pro

[tiremonkey2000]

David Lee Roth - Just a Gigalo

[tiremonkey2000]

Mudvayne - Not Falling

[BakedDon]

walk the line-jonny cash

http://www.ssupload.com/videos/walk-the-line-jonny-cash

[BakedDon]

http://www.ssupload.com/videos/when-a-stranger-calls

When a Stranger Calls

[BakedDon]

http://www.ssupload.com/videos/john-tucker-must-die


John Tucker Must Die

[BakedDon]

Rocky Balboa! (It ain't over 'til it's over)

http://www.ssupload.com/videos/it-aint-over-til-its-over

[tiremonkey2000]

Red Hot Chilli Peppers - Can't Stop

[BakedDon]

http://www.ssupload.com/videos/eragon

Eragon

[BakedDon]

Children of Men

http://www.ssupload.com/videos/children-of-men

[BakedDon]

http://www.ssupload.com/videos/family-guy-presents-stewie-griffin---the-untold-story
Family Guy Presents: Stewie Griffin - The Untold Story

[BakedDon]

http://www.ssupload.com/videos/crank

Crank

[BakedDon]

http://www.ssupload.com/videos/resident-evil-apocalypse-resident-evil-2

Resident Evil 2

[BakedDon]

Death Of a President

http://www.ssupload.com/videos/president

[tiremonkey2000]

Blind Melon - Tones of Home

[BakedDon]

Fast/Furious/Tokyo Drift

http://www.ssupload.com/videos/the-fast-and-the-furious-tokyo-drift

[tiremonkey2000]

http://www.ssupload.com/videos/eragon

Eragon
I dled this one but have'nt watched it yet.

[BakedDon]

http://www.ssupload.com/videos/lake

Lakehouse

http://www.ssupload.com/videos/grandma

[BakedDon]

I dled this one but have'nt watched it yet.


Its a decent copy

someone may stand up once or twice

just like the theater

[BakedDon]

http://www.ssupload.com/videos/departed

The Departed

[tiremonkey2000]

R.E.M. - It's the end of the world as we know It

[BakedDon]

Stay Alive

http://www.ssupload.com/videos/stay-alive

[BakedDon]

http://www.ssupload.com/videos/step-up

Step Up

http://www.ssupload.com/videos/click

[BakedDon]

Want more you gotta keep up with my bulletins on myspace

http://www.myspace.com/rmc313

[tiremonkey2000]

Rush - Tom Sawyer

[tiremonkey2000]

Flyleaf - Fully Alive

[tiremonkey2000]

David Bowie - The Jean Genie

[tiremonkey2000]

Genesis - Invisible Touch (live)