P2P Manifesto, Wow Someone "Gets it"

P2P Manifesto: because P2P is unstoppable, positive for companies, for the market and for users

“Quantity and quality of P2P technologies are inversely proportional to the numbers of lawsuits issued to stop P2P�
3rd Monty’s Law

Content

* P2P Manifesto Abstract
* P2P is unstoppable
* P2P is positive for Companies
* P2P is positive for the market
* P2P is good for users
* Suggested Web Sites, Blogs, Links

P2P Manifesto Abstract:

P2P it’s a revolutionary technology. P2P is technically unstoppable.

Most of all, P2P it’s positive for companies, for the market and it’s good for users.

P2P has already proven to be an unbreakable technology.

Both centralized server systems and decentralized ones are evolving, improving every day, adding new features that makes, as a matter of fact, totally useless both complaints issued by Majors and technical surveilling countermeasures.

Companies can benefit by P2P technology both for empowering their products distribution (products, content, information, etc.) and for creating new kind of business.

P2P has refreshed the market by enlarging the number of players and the market size itself.

Users enjoy sharing all possible information.

It's natural that they have immediately adopted P2P technology because it allows them to have what they want when they want it.

Without intermediation and directly from the “info owner�.

File sharing is evolving to “social sharing� where individuals share all kind of social interesting information.

The swappers of today are becoming “file networkers�, individuals capable of creating large social networks that soon will be -paradoxically - the most desired ally of the Majors.

P2P will then soon become a more complex integrated system for sharing and networking (PnetP).

P2P is here to stay.

1) P2P is unstoppable

P2P it’s a revolutionary and unstoppable technology.

But the greater part of the industry and many content producers are convinced of being able to arrest the peer to peer/file sharing piracy, repressing it through complaints and by controlling technology (with sophisticated DRM or creating controllable peer to peer networks).
Read Full Story