Richard Stallman, an American freedom activist who founded the Free Software Foundation and pioneered the concept of copyleft has thrashed anti piracy outfits and said it’s time to give file sharers a break and put the problem to bed.Stallman, who has long been involved with openness and is the main author of the most widely, used software license (GNU General Public License), hit out at anti piracy outfits and called for an end to the file sharing war. He even came up with some advice on how he thinks the problem could be solved for all involved.
He suggests that governments introduce a new tax scheme that would help support artists work. The government would then distribute resources to artists depending on how popular they are. In essence “fairly successful” artists would be supported adequately. According to IT News, he also said that artists are “not entitled” to compensation from listeners.
Stallman went on to say that artists could also earn more cash by using a donate type button where fans could pay what they wanted for the music.
"A lot of people will push that button because it feels good to support the artist," he said.
This concept proved successful for Radiohead a few years ago when they released the album In Rainbows. They simply let users pay what they thought the album was worth. There was no middle man, no label and no distributor. The album was made available exclusively on radiohead.com
Stallman recently spoke at the World Computer Congress in Brisbane and told how our digital society needed to be "free" in order to be beneficial.
SO, would you be interested in paying an extra tax to download how and when you want to or is this just a wacky idea? Whacky or not, the entertainment industry have showed us on numerous occasions that they have no interest in a resolution to the problem if it means a change in their business model.
Let us knows your thoughts on a taxable
file sharing world! 










Sections
Poll
vBulletin Message